I’ve been teaching at the college level now for about six years. I’m teaching a course (Principles of Paleontology) that I’ve now taught in its current form four times. It’s becoming old-hat. I’m familiar enough with the lecture notes by now that I find I’m just reading off what I’d written years ago without much thought. Continue reading “On Classroom Arguments”
Category Archives: Teaching
Running TNT for Phylogenetic Analysis (on a Mac)
This blog post is meant to be informational. You can stop reading now if you don’t know what a cladistic analysis is and don’t care to ever know how to do one.
If you’re still reading, this post is written to provide what I’ve learned about getting TNT, a free phylogenetic analysis program, to work properly on a Mac. Bear in mind that I do not currently own a Mac. What I’m sharing with you is what we figured out as a class when I had my students use this program as part of a cladistics exercise.Continue reading “Running TNT for Phylogenetic Analysis (on a Mac)”
On Writing Exams
I’m writing this little post as I take a brief break from the pleasure that is known as “writing an exam.”Continue reading “On Writing Exams”
Welcome to 2013
It’s a new year. 2013 is all of five days old. And I’m exhausted already. But it’s a new year. A completely arbitrary starting point, of course, but an opportunity to ‘start afresh.’ What do I want to do with this year?
Frankly, I haven’t had any chance to think about what I want to do with this new year because the old year just won’t let go! The end of the fall semester always means playing catch-up with all the things that I put off doing because I was busy teaching. I look at my to-do list and it makes me want to cry. But what can I do?
Well, it’s time to put up or shut up. There are things I want to accomplish this year and there are things I have to accomplish this year. Right now, the have-to-dos out-weigh the want-to-dos, but I’m making a point of continuing to slog forward on the want-to-do list. Luckily, with want-to-dos, I’m willing to work on them at funny hours, because I want to do them.
Have-to-dos get done at work. I have to get the elemental analyzer running properly (that’ll be Monday’s task). I have to catalog some fossils (to do on Wednesday). I need to grind up some teeth and fish scales (not sure when I’ll do that, but I will). Oh, there’s data to normalize. I can do that remotely from home. That might wait until someone prompts me. Class preparation: Sadly, that will likely wait until classes start. I just don’t have time to think about it right now. And there’s a couple of papers to review here. That won’t be too bad. Oh, and those every-Tuesday for the next nine weeks talks. Yeah, I need to get on that! I have five of them mostly ready now. I’m in good shape.
Now for the want-to-dos: Finish the rewrite on my novel “Prince of Herongarde.” I can do that, if I can just shake this migraine. Blog every day. Yeah. That’s what you’re reading. Progress as a swordsman (or should it be swordswoman?). Getting there. I’ve had health problems of late, but I’m not going backwards. That’s good. Do some more sewing. I have been offered a couple of challenges. I like challenges. I’ll get ‘er done, but maybe not this month.
Naw, I’ll get to it. I’ll get to it all. I just have to accept that January will be the month of the have-to-dos and postpone many of the want-to-dos for later in the year. I have to remind myself not to get frustrated and surround myself with people who will encourage me when I get down on myself. I think I’m ready. Are you?
Our Protectors (and How Our Society is Sick)
It’s Christmas Eve. I’ve come down with a cold and am basically miserable. I don’t feel much like celebrating anything as it is.
On Friday night into Saturday morning, we had a windy storm blow through. It knocked a tree into the powerlines across the street from our house. I remember sipping my coffee and wondering why there were firetrucks on the street. Then I saw it:

Very soon after I took this photo (from my front window, mind you), the thing went up in a huge fireball. Well, actually three fireballs, until the lines broke. Then we left to camp at some friends’ house to wait for the electric to come back on.
I’m grateful for our firemen who were there that morning. I have to say that. It seemed trivial at the time, but I feel it now, very strongly. I thanked a firefighter as we left, just from basic respect for doing what he most likely considers ‘just his job.’ I was glad he was there. I knew our home would be fine.
This morning, this was on the local news:

How could this be? Firefighters doing nothing more than what they consider their job, shot and killed in the line of duty. Two more in the hospital. And Webster is only two towns over! This is in my back yard!
Gunman shoots at least four firefighters, at least two dead, as they arrive to put out a house fire in Webster, NY gothamist.com/2012/12/24/two…
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) December 24, 2012
Officials identify firefighters who were shot in Webster bit.ly/12AOkFg
— YNN Rochester (@YNN_Rochester) December 24, 2012
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.jsWhat is wrong with our society? How can this happen? Why did someone feel that they needed to shoot at our protectors?
<rant>
This is my rant. This is my opinion. I know that this is a more complicated problem than what I present here, but as this falls on the heels of the CT shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, and all the other obscene murders that have happened of late, I submit this.
Our society is sick. It is sick because we have decided that it is more important that everyone should get a prize just for trying, so that they feel good about themselves. Fundamentally, it’s great to encourage people to be happy in their own skin, but we’ve done a disservice by always providing prizes for participation and always trying to make sure ‘everyone wins.’
In the real world, not everyone wins. People fail. Things go wrong. People leave the school systems feeling good because they’ve always been given positive reinforcement after they falter, then when real failure comes (can’t find a job, lose your job, can’t afford the car you want), they don’t know how to cope. We don’t teach people how to accept failure and move on, because we protect our children from failure. So when real life happens, complete with failure, they go on a rampage.
Most people do figure out the difference between real-life and the A-for-effort they always got in school, and learn how to deal with failure. Yet still, most people are left with a sense of entitlement. “I deserve that fancy car!” It doesn’t help that most advertizing plays on this, telling people that they deserve the best. Then folks go out, spend money they don’t have, and have problems. They fail. And then…
Our society is sick. We are not entitled to things just because we put in a little effort, or have lived X-amount of years. And failure is a part of life that we need to learn to cope with. Success isn’t granted. It’s not a participation sticker. You’ve got to work, and learn, and FAIL once in a while.
I’m not saying that I don’t suffer from this sense of entitlement just like everyone else. I’m sure I do. We’re an entirely spoiled society. We have a lot of our basic needs provided. We don’t know just how good we’ve got it (until the day the power goes out and you realize that the house is going to get very cold and you don’t know what to do about it!)
Accept failure, folks. Learn from it. Rise above it. DON’T BLAME OTHERS FOR IT! Get over yourself and move on.
</rant>
Thanks for listening. I apologize for any typos – I wrote this in a hurry. I apologize for any offense as well. I recognize that 1) there are always exceptions and 2) broad sweeping generalizations tend not to apply equally to everyone. Let’s all try to enjoy this celebratory time of year, no matter how you choose to do so.
********Added Christmas day:
How you can help the West Webster firefighters. whec.com/news/stories/S… — news10nbc (@news10nbc) December 25, 2012
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Or, support your local fire department. These people serve us. Let’s give a little back…
Friday Headlines: 12-14-12
Friday Headlines, December 14, 2012
THE LATEST IN THE GEOSCIENCES
LAND CREATURES MIGHT NOT HAVE COME FROM THE SEA
Well, this is a little deceptive. What this headline conjures in the imagination is the traditional vision of the fish, dragging itself onto land, developing legs, and ultimately becoming human.
What’s being discussed here, however, is life before vertebrates. Life before bones. The oldest types of multi-cellular life, more than twice the age of that fish that crawled onto land. This new finding (probably pay-walled) is in reference to the Ediacara Fauna, which is thought to have been ancestral to modern organisms, vertebrate and invertebrate. It appears that the organisms of the Ediacara Fauna lived on land, not under water.
Ediacaran fossils are among the most bizarre looking fossils out there, causing paleontologists to scratch their heads for years. They seem to be soft-bodied animals that have been considered potentially related to primitive worms, or jellyfish, or maybe molluscs, all of which presumably would have lived in the ancient ocean.
In the new paper, Greg Retallack argues that the rocks that the fossils are found in are paleosols – which is a fancy term for a fossilized soil. Soils do not form under water. They are a land phenomenon. Retallack used many lines of evidence to support that he was looking at paleosols rather than a sea floor, including the rock texture (it looks more like wind-blown silt than ocean-floor clay), cracks from drying (definitely wouldn’t happen underwater), carbonate nodules (which are common in soils), and stable isotopic evidence.
This new interpretation affects how we think about the origins of multicellular life, because suddenly the earliest multi-cellular forms of life were already on land. It also affects how we interpret the lifestyles of the Ediacaran fossils. Suddenly, they’re not floating around any more and that changes the kinds of things an organism can do.
An important thing to think about here is that this does not mean that life originated on land. It also does not mean that multi-cellular live originated on land. What it means is that the earliest fossils of multi-cellular life that we have on Earth were land organisms. The earliest life-forms were all soft-bodies creatures. They don’t fossilize well, which is why we don’t have much of a record. Hard parts came about in Cambrian times (after the Ediacaran Fauna), and that’s when we suddenly have a great fossil record. There probably were soft-bodied organisms living in the oceans at the same time as the Ediacaran organisms – they just weren’t preserved.
BRILLIANT GEMINID METEOR SHOWER PEAKS TONIGHT (December 13)
The Geminids are a meteor shower that seems to radiate from within the Constellation Gemini. This meteor shower comes every year in early-to-mid December. We’re in luck this year, as it seems we’ll have a new moon, making the sky nice and dark and the meteors especially visible.
The Geminids are cool because they apparently arise from an asteroid (named Phaethon) rather than a comet like most other meteor showers. The orbit of Phaethon is much more like that of a comet than of a typical asteroid. Here’s a cool Java applet that shows its orbit. We know it’s not a comet because it lacks important features, like a tail, that comets have.
The Geminids will be just past their peak when this post goes live, but they should still be evident for a few more nights. Hopefully the skies will be clear so we can all go out and look for a while.
Introducing Friday Headlines
Friday Headlines is something I do in my introductory geology course to make Fridays more interesting and to keep the topic of the course relevant to the students. I put together a short PowerPoint presentation (10 minutes max) and tell them about two or three events in the geological sciences that have happened in the last week.
These events can be global happenings, like an earthquake or volcanic eruption; they could be the interesting findings of a freshly-published paper; or they could be some grand new discovery from NASA, like ice on Mercury or organic material on Mars. I’ve talked about global warming, peak oil, the arrest of geoscientists for incorrectly predicting earthquakes, and the Anthropocene.
What ever I choose, it is something interesting to the general public (thus, my students) and relevant to the geological sciences. My goal is to show students that things happen in the geosciences all the time, so that they understand that what I’m teaching them is actually useful in the real world.
Friday Headlines also make coming to class on Friday a bit more interesting. Students seem to like it for the change, as do I. A standard lecture every day can be pretty dull, even for the instructor.
I’ve enjoyed doing Friday Headlines during the fall semester for the last three years now. I’ve decided to take the concept a bit further and make it a recurring post in my blog. It’ll ensure at least one blog post per week (with the only possible exception being during the field season when I might not be near a computer), and should help me and my followers stay on top what’s happening in the geosciences and remember why geosciences matter.
Tomorrow I’ll post my inaugural Friday Headines article. I hope you’ll enjoy them as much as I do!
Beware of Movies! The Interior of the Earth
The Beware of Movies! series is meant to point out some of the scientific inaccuracies of popular movies, specifically in points related to the geological sciences.
This blog post will point out the major inaccuracies portrayed in movies about the structure and composition of the Earth.
One might think that we have no way to know what the interior of the Earth is like. The Earth is over 6000 kilometers in diameter, and we’re doing good to drill a few kilometers into the crust.
Here’s the reality of the Earth’s structure. At first pass, the Earth is composed of the crust, the mantle, and the core. The mantle and the core are each divided into two parts, the upper and lower mantle, and the inner and outer core.
The crust is the part that we live on. It is very, very thin compared to the rest of the Earth, going down only to about 7 to 70 km (depending on where you are). The base of the crust is marked by the Moho (which is short for the Mohorovičić discontinuity). Below that is the upper mantle down to a depth of about 660 km, followed by the lower mantle down to about 2900 km. It is a common misconception that the mantle, being very hot and under pressure, is molten. This is absolutely untrue. The mantle is solid rock, with one tiny exception in the upper mantle that we’ll get to in a moment.
Below the mantle is the core. The outer core, from 2900 to 5155 km in depth, is the only part of the interior of the Earth that is fully molten. It is composed of molten iron and nickel. It is here where the Earth’s magnetic field is generated. This is one of the few things that were correctly attributed in the movie “The Core.” From 5155 km to the true center of the Earth is the solid inner core, which is composed mostly of iron and nickel.
This simplistic, three-part division (crust, mantle, core) is the extent of the description of the interior of the Earth provided by the movie, “The Core.” Equally, “Journey to the Center of the Earth” (2008) is no better. Both are over-simplifications.
Before we move forward, it is probably worthwhile to explore how we can possibly know this much about the interior of our planet. As I already pointed out, we haven’t actually drilled completely through the crust. How can we possibly know the structure or the composition of the interior of the Earth.
The movie “The Core” actually begins to show us how this is done. Solid rock can transmit seismic waves. Every time there is an earthquake somewhere on Earth, it sets off waves that pass completely through the Earth and can be recorded at seismic stations throughout the globe. Some waves pass through the Earth, others can only move along the surface. Seismic stations record both types and seismologists can determine when and where the earthquakes happened based upon when the waves are recorded.
The way that waves pass through the Earth are affected by the types of rock. Some rocks speed up the waves, others slow them down. Waves bounce around inside the earth, too. So a seismic wave might bounce off of the core-mantle boundary. These properties, combined with multiple seismic stations, make it possible for us to know the composition of the Earth and the approximate position of any important boundaries within the Earth.
Furthermore, one type of seismic wave, shear waves, won’t pass through liquids. So if a seismograph recording an earthquake shows no shear waves, we know that the seismic waves went through a liquid. This is how we know that the mantle is solid rock and that the outer core is molten.
Beware of movies: In “The Core,” the terranauts find huge open cavities in the mantle. If such open spaces existed, they would have been evident from seismic studies. No seismic wave could pass through an empty space like that, and we would know about them. Similarly, in “Journey to the Center of the Earth” (2008), the main character discusses the existence of tubes that bypass the mantle and go straight to the core, which in the movie is hollow. Again, seismic waves would have shown such tubes and caverns.
Since earthquakes occur all around the Earth all the time, one needs only to have a global set of seismic monitoring stations, and we can learn all about the Earth’s structure. Such a global network exists. Because of that, we know that the Earth is actually far more complex than just crust, mantle, and core.
Many people are aware of the important concept in geology called “Plate Tectonics.” At a first pass, Plate Tectonics explains why it seems like South America and Africa would fit so well together, like puzzle pieces. That’s because they did once fit together and have since moved apart. The moving units on the Earth’s surface are called ‘plates.’ There’s a South American plate and an African plate. They were once together and have since moved apart.
Individual plates are not just pieces of crust moving around on top of the mantle (a common misconception). The plates are pieces of the “lithosphere,” which includes the crust plus the uppermost part of the mantle down to about 100 km. Crust plus the uppermost mantle (called the lithospheric mantle) equals the lithosphere. The crust and lithospheric mantle move as one big piece called a plate.

Below the lithosphere, is the asthenosphere, which goes down to about 400 km in depth – basically much of the rest of the upper mantle. It’s in the asthenosphere that flow occurs.
But wait! The mantle is solid rock! How can it flow?
Two things happen: 1) Just like wax is a solid that can flow, so can the mantle. Individual atoms within the minerals of the mantle can move causing very, very slow flow. 2) Because of temperature and pressure gradients, between 100 and 200 km in depth there is the tiniest bit of melting. The whole rock doesn’t melt, just a few of the minerals. This slows down shear waves, but doesn’t stop them completely, which is how we know this slight melting exists. We call it the low velocity zone, because it slows down the shear waves.
The various layers of the Earth have fairly specific compositions. The core is mostly nickel and iron, as previously mentioned. The rest of the Earth’s composition can be explained using Bowen’s reaction series. Read more about it here.

The basic rocks of the universe are ultramafic rocks, so we would expect that the bulk of the Earth is composed of ultramafic rocks, which are primarily the mineral olivine. Ultramafic rocks are characterized by having high iron and magnesium and low silica.
The crust of the Earth has some mafic rocks and minerals, but most are intermediate to felsic in composition, meaning that there’s high silica, potassium, aluminum, and sodium. These compositions are attained when the mafic rocks of the mantle are melted and erupted, then cycled through the rock cycle multiple times. Every time a rock is re-melted, the most mafic parts of it tend to be last to melt, and might not erupt, resulting in rocks that become more and more felsic over geologic time.
Beware of movies: In “The Core,” the terranauts discover huge amethyst crystals in the upper mantle. Amethyst is a type of quartz, which is a felsic mineral. The mantle is ultramafic. What this means is that quartz would not be stable, it could not exist, in the mantle. This is a big mistake.
Beware of movies: Both “The Core” and “Journey to the Center of the Earth” make the mistake of thinking that diamonds would be abundant in the mantle. The reality is that there are diamonds in the upper mantle, where conditions of temperature and pressure are suitable to form diamonds. And, “Journey to the Center of the Earth” never really specifies where they are in the mantle – probably fairly high, so maybe that’s ok (although there’s an additional problem with muscovite in that movie). In “The Core,” however, they discover huge diamonds presumably in the lower mantle, at least fairly close to the core-mantle boundary. Conditions aren’t suitable for diamonds low in the mantle, lack of carbon notwithstanding. The giant diamonds are bogus.
This is the general understanding of the interior of the Earth, and how we know what we know. On this topic, movies are typically either pretty-darn-good or completely wrong. As always, extreme caution needs to be used when trying to apply the science of movies to real life.
*****Added January 15, 2013*****
I’ve discovered that I left some things out of this post. Please visit this post to learn more about what meteorites and magnetism have to do with our understanding of the Earth’s interior.
Bad Geology Movies: Armageddon, 1998
Armageddon
1998
Bruce Willis, Ben Afflek, Liv Tyler
Premise: What if a Texas-sized asteroid were careening toward Earth and we only had 18 days to stop it?
The idea is an interesting one. We know that there was an asteroid impact on Earth at the same time the dinosaurs went extinct and there is a lot of evidence to suggest that the impact itself was a huge factor causing the extinction. So, what if it were about to happen again, only now we were able to detect the oncoming asteroid and could (potentially) do something about it?
In the opening sequence, the narrator describes the dinosaur-killing asteroid as six-miles wide. That may be right. It seems reasonable, anyway. The narrator goes on to describe a global dust cloud which lasted for 1000 years, through which the sun could not penetrate. For the sake of the movie, that’s as good as anything. But do be aware that there are plenty of competing hypotheses about what happened after the impact. Some involve incinerating the Earth, not coving it with dust. Or triggering volcanoes. Or all of the above. But, that there was an impact is no longer debated.
Since this is about bad geology movies, I won’t go into the details of problems with the rest of the movie aside from the geology. The movie was fairly fun… until they were on the asteroid. Then I started having problems.
1) Our characters miss their landing site by 26 miles. They wind up in a region of “compressed iron ferrite.” They also describe it as a compressed iron plate. Iron ferrite is not any mineral or rock that I’ve heard of. “Ferrite” as a word on its own, is another word that means ‘iron.’ So iron ferrite is an iron-bearing iron rock (or mineral, they never clarify). So it’s redundant. You see the phrase “Iron Ferrite” on google, but I suspect people put the two together because most folks don’t realize that the ‘ferrite’ part already says ‘iron.’
2) All over the place (on the asteroid) are huge crystals jutting all around. It’s reminiscent of Superman’s home planet of Krypton, or perhaps his Fortress of Solitude up in the Arctic. Such crystals aren’t going to form in the vacuum of space, especially not in an area composed entirely of iron ferrite. They looked like gypsum crystals, which wouldn’t make much sense on an asteroid.
3) The topography of the asteroid was bizarre. One would expect craters, with steep slopes and whatnot, but not a “Grand Canyon.” A canyon like that is an erosional feature, that you wouldn’t expect on an asteroid. But maybe it was a great big crack in the asteroid. Why then did they not drill there, where the rock was already fractured and weak?
4) One more thing bothered me, but maybe it’s not so bad. This asteroid seemed to have an atmosphere. There were the random fireballs which made no sense to me. And then the wind blew, slightly, at the end when Bruce Willis’ character picks up some of the dust and let it fall from his hand.
There was just a lot wrong with the asteroid, which spoiled the movie for me, mostly. The movie was enjoyable otherwise, with some fun and charming characters.
Beware of Movies! Foundations of Geology – Minerals and Rocks
Beware of Movies! will be a series of blog posts discussing important concepts in geology while making reference to scientific errors in movies and TV regarding geological concepts. These posts go in concert with a lecture series I’m preparing with the same idea. It seemed fun.
This is the first post in the Beware of Movies! series.
A common misconception about geology is that it is a science ONLY about minerals and rocks. Well, and oil. But that’s it. Geology is a tiny bit more complex than that. However, it does include rocks (and minerals) as an important fundamental basis. A person can’t say much in any field of the earth sciences without first knowing quite a bit about minerals.
MINERAL:
1) Naturally occurring
2) Inorganic
3) Solid
4) Specific crystalline structure
5) Specific chemical composition
Any compound that fits the above definition is a mineral. Ice (frozen water) is a mineral because it satisfies these criteria. Bismuth hopper crystals do not satisfy these criteria because they’re synthetics, so, while quite lovely, they do not constitute a mineral.
CHEMISTRY:
When I start to talk about chemistry, my Introductory Geology students always groan. But I’m always able to assure them that what matters here is pretty basic and that it’ll be over soon. Chemistry matters because minerals have a specific chemical composition. This means that the individual atoms that go into a mineral are specified. The atoms are specific elements, like carbon and oxygen, and certain numbers of each of them combine (bond) to form the minerals. I will spare you the details of how the atoms bond. What’s important is that atoms have size. They’re like little spheres of differing sizes depending on the elements. When you try to stack the elements together, they stack in very specific ways. That is what causes the crystalline structure of minerals.
The stacking of the elements forming a mineral also results in all the recognizable properties of minerals that we use to identify them, including:
Color – what color is it?
Luster – how would we describe the shininess of the mineral? Metallic, earthy, glassy.
Specific gravity – how dense is it?
Crystal form – what shape are the crystals?
Cleavage and fracture – how do the crystals break? Do they break along specific planes or along random surfaces?
Hardness – is the mineral soft, like talcum powder, or hard like diamonds?
MINERAL GROUPS:
Minerals are grouped by their basic chemistry:
Oxides – have oxygen (O) like Fe2O3, hematite (rust).
Sulfides – have sulfur (S) like PbS, galena.
Sulfates – have sulfate (SO4) like CaSO4 H2O, gypsum.
Carbonates – have carbonate (CO3) like CaCO3, calcite (chalk).
Native elements – gold, silver, carbon like diamonds!
Silicates – have silica (The silica tetrahedron – SiO4) like SiO2, quartz
Beware of movies: In Armageddon (1998), our heroes are forced to drill into an asteroid to implant a nuclear device. Where they wind up setting down, so claim the characters, is composed of “iron ferrite.” That’s not any mineral I’ve heard of. It’s a redundant name, actually, because the ‘ferrite’ part, like ‘ferric’ or ‘ferrous,’ refers to iron. So iron ferrite is an iron-bearing iron rock.
This is the most important group of minerals on Earth, in that they constitute most of the Earth. Therefore, oxygen and silicon are the most abundant elements on Earth. Life is carbon-based, but we’re just a think veneer on a very, very large sphere. But if silicon is so common, why are there not silicon-based life forms?
Silicate minerals are categorized by how the silica tetrahedra relate to each other in the mineral. They can be isolated, or bonded to one another by sharing the one or all of the oxygens on the tips of the tetrahedra, to form chains, sheets, or complex networks. While this sounds like there’d be lots of silicate minerals, it turns out that there are relatively few that a person needs to know to be able to identify most minerals in ordinary rocks. We’ll get to that in a moment.
ROCK:
A rock is an amalgamation of individual mineral grains. Often there are several minerals in a rock, like granite that contains quartz, biotite, and two types of feldspars. But a rock can be composed of grains of all one mineral. The best example of this is a nice clean sandstone which can be made of only quartz grains.
Beware of movies: In Journey to the Center of the Earth (2008), Muscovite is called a “thin rock formation.” Muscovite is a mineral, not a rock. It does make nice thin sheets (because of its cleavage), but it’s not a rock.
Bowen’s reaction series describes the stability of silicate minerals under different temperature regimes. Minerals at the top of the reaction series, form under conditions of extreme heat, but are not stable at the lower temperatures at the Earth’s surface. Minerals at the bottom of the series are more stable at low temperatures (like those on the Earth’s surface).
Understanding Bowen’s reaction series will help anyone identify minerals in a rock. See, the minerals that go together in a rock aren’t just randomly selected. Certain minerals occur together. Some minerals are never found together in a rock. The minerals that can occur together are those that are stable at the same temperature ranges. So Olivine and Quartz will never occur in the same rock, for example.
The minerals that are stable at high temperature are the mafic minerals, which are high in magnesium, iron,and calcium, and low in silica. The minerals that are stable at low temperatures (and are common on the Earth’s surface) are called felsic minerals, and are high in silica and hight in sodium, potassium, and aluminum. This doesn’t matter now, but will matter later when we think about volcanoes.
Beware of Movies: The movie “The Core” seemed to struggle a bit with Bowen’s reaction series. The mantle of the Earth (the layer below the crust, where we’re living), is composed of ultramafic rocks. This means, high iron, high magnesium, and low silica. However, in the movie, the intrepid ‘terranauts’ find themselves in a large empty cavity in the upper mantle that is full of amethyst (quartz) crystals. Quartz is felsic. It would never be stable in the mantle. This is a massive mistake.
ROCK GROUPS:
All rocks on Earth can be divided into three groups (and some might fit into more than one).
Igneous rocks: Those rocks that formed from the cooling of molten rock (magma). In these the crystals that make up the rock form according to Bowen’s reaction series (as well as the composition of the magma itself).
Sedimentary rocks: Rocks that formed from the deposition of bits and pieces of other rocks that have been broken down and (probably) transported elsewhere. Alternatively, sedimentary rocks can form from the precipitation of crystals directly out of water, rather like hard water deposits.
Metamorphic rocks: If pre-exisiting rocks of any kind are subjected to great heat and/or pressure, the minerals present, and their relationships to one another may change. This results in metamorphic rocks.
Beware of movies: Bowen’s reaction series helps explain what silicate minerals might go together. There are similar limitations on what other minerals might occur together by what rock type they will be found in. In Journey to the Center of the Earth (2008), they find rubies, emeralds, and diamonds together in a lava tube. None of these would occur together. Emeralds are usually found in felsic igneous rocks. Rubies are found in metamorphic rocks, and diamonds form deep in the mantle, far away from either of the places where emeralds or rubies might form.
Any of the three types of rock (igneous, metamorphic, or sedimentary) can be changed into any other type of rock in what is called the rock cycle. Existing rocks can be melted and cool again to make new igneous rocks. Existing rocks can be broken down, transported, and redeposited into sedimentary rocks. And any existing rock can be exposed to high heat and pressure to form a metamorphic rock. The end result is that there are very few tremendously old rocks on Earth, because most have been recycled.
These are some of the basic concepts necessary to understand further topics in geology. Without this basis, it would be impossible to begin to interpret the Earth’s history from its rock record.
