They look like burrowing owls…

Stink Bug Saturday. It’s become a regular thing on this blog. I write a chapter every week to continue the story that started with a silly photo of a stink bug in my home office quite literally blocking my escape.

This stink bug was blocking my escape!
This stink bug was blocking my escape!

I started writing a story to go with it. It was fun. The story has gone off in a different direction that I had expected it to go. The stink bug is gone now. For the moment anyway. Maybe.

The story is a prime example of the ‘pantsing’ style of writing. I’m writing by the seat of my pants. I have no idea what the next chapter will bring or what’s going to happen next until I sit down and write it. There’s not forethought, no long-term plan.

In the process, it’s been revealed that the stink bug isn’t a real bug after all. Our main character (the story is written in the first person), is a middle-aged, overweight accountant named Nate. When he first sees the stink bug for what it really is, he laughs because it looks like a burrowing owl with an extra set of arms.

A burrowing owl. Now imagine arms hanging out from under its wings.

Well not quite, but close.

Back, many years ago, when I was in high school (and dinosaurs still roamed the Earth), I made it a hobby of creating new sentient vertebrate species. They were typically things like “an intelligent cheetah” or “a bipedal horse-person.” The snake-men were among my favorites. They just wound up being cute. Geez, I ought to post some of the old drawings I did. I have folders and folders of them.

One of the myriad of critters I came up with were the bird-men. They actually have a name that I came up with back then, but in retrospect, it’s a really lame name, so I’m trying to come up with something better. You can make suggestions in the comments below.

Anyway, given my deep and abiding interest in vertebrate anatomy, whatever creature I came up with had to be anatomically ‘functional.’ Of course, what I knew about vertebrate anatomy was all self-taught, so there were some – er – problems. Now, with my more thorough knowledge of vertebrate anatomy and evolution, the beasties are more realistic (though still probably highly unlikely).

Since the bird-men came back in the stink bug story, I started messing with their anatomy again. I might have caught myself doing a few sketches during a department seminar.

The lecture was about mineral growth. These drawings are clearly related.
The lecture was about mineral growth. These drawings are clearly related.
I did a second sketch of the skeleton and decided on the long tail. But I couldn't sort out how the rib cage worked, nor could I figure how one might look facing you.
I did a second sketch of the skeleton and decided on the long tail. But I couldn’t sort out how the rib cage worked, nor could I figure how one might look facing you.

Obviously, I needed to do a little research. I wandered around the building and took some photos of a crow skeleton that was in one of the biology department’s cases. Very helpful!

The crow skeleton in profile.
The crow skeleton in profile.
An oblique view of the crow.
An oblique view of the crow.
Perhaps the most useful photo I took. The back of the crow, showing how its shoulders go together.
Perhaps the most useful photo I took. The back of the crow, showing how its shoulders go together. This was taken through glass, which is why you see the ghostly image of my legs there.

I also jumped on-line and found a nice photograph of an eagle skeleton. Given that my bird-man beasts are predators, I wanted to study the skeleton of an avian raptor.

Eagle skeleton

I also spent a little time looking at reconstructions of Archaeopteryx and Velociraptor, because I wanted to give the bird-men a long tail.

I sat down and did a few more sketches of the skeleton, and began to flesh them out.

It's really, really sketchy, but this is an improved skeletal drawing.
It’s really, really sketchy, but this is an improved skeletal drawing.

I attempted a sketch of the beast in profile.

Not quite happy with this. Still doesn't look enough like a burrowing owl, but it's getting closer.
Not quite happy with this. Still doesn’t look enough like a burrowing owl, but it’s getting closer.

The more difficult aspect to draw is the oblique view. I don’t think I was entirely successful.

An oblique view. Just can't seem to get the arms right.
An oblique view. Just can’t seem to get the arms right.

I need to make some clay models of the animal and/or its skeleton so that I can get a better sense of how the arms would hang. In my mind, it all makes sense, but I can’t transpose it to paper.

Portrait of a bird-man.
Portrait of a bird-man. I do feel like I’m establishing what their faces look like, even if I can’t get the arms right.

The good news is that despite the fact that I can’t draw the beast (its arms anyway), I have a much clearer image of what the bird-men look like so that I can continue with my writing.

I still don’t have a name for them though. I’m open to suggestions. What might they call themselves? Something that a mockingbird or parrot might be able to say? They’re birds, after all.

If you’re interested in the stink bug story, it begins here, with Chapter 1.

7 Comments

  1. Dave H's avatar Dave H says:

    So is commenting working yet?

    Like

  2. Dave H's avatar Dave H says:

    Well, I -had- a great reply but the system wouldn’t let me post it.

    I’ll just say that your bird-man reminds me of the Mothman, which was sighted about 40 miles from where I lived when I was 7.

    Like

    1. paleololigo's avatar Penny says:

      Bummer that commenting went on the fritz. I hate that.

      Mothman, eh? Sounds… intriguing.

      Like

      1. Dave H's avatar Dave H says:

        Ever hear of The Mothman Prophecies? It was a film in 2002 (I think) starring Richard Gere, based on a book written in 1975 about the Mothman sightings in Pt. Pleasant, WV in 1966-67. I remember hearing about the creature in the news, and I wanted to catch it so I put a trap in the front yard.

        An investigator commissioned a composite sketch of the creature, which is here:

        The face-on pose in your second sketch reminded me of it.

        The creature was seen by individuals and small groups, usually at twilight or at night, starting in late 1966. It was described as 5 to 7 feet tall, wings 10 feet long, with eyes that shone red when they caught the light. On a few occasions it approached or followed witnesses but didn’t make any threatening gestures.

        Sightings went on for about a year, and ended about the time the Silver Bridge in Pt. Pleasant collapsed into the Ohio River, killing 46 people. The movie implies the Mothman was a supernatural being that was responsible.

        One other thing that caught my notice. The book was written by John Keel. (grin)

        Like

      2. paleololigo's avatar Penny says:

        Wow, it does look like the Mothman. Maybe they really exist(ed)!

        Like

  3. Dave H's avatar Dave H says:

    By the way, regarding the arms – I think the fact that you’re attaching them to the chest, inboard of the shoulders, might be what’s throwing you off. Human arms attach at the corners. That’s why angels and other winged humanoids are drawn with wings attached to the back like a butterfly, on or between the shoulder blades. Not very accurate physiologically, but hey, it’s art.

    Like

    1. paleololigo's avatar Penny says:

      Yeah, I’m trying to add an extra joint just forward of the main wing-shoulder joint. It won’t have the flexibility or mobility of our arms and will definitely be tucked under the wings and probably mostly hidden under the body feathers. Such a bizarre set-up.

      Like

Leave a reply to Penny Cancel reply