Are Photos Enough to Name a Species – #365papers – 2017 – 82

#365papers for March 23, 2017

Garraffoni and Frietas, 2017, Photos belong in the taxonomic Code: Science, v 355, p. 805

Gutierrez and Pine, 2017, Specimen collection crucial to taxonomy: Science, v. 355, p. 1275.

What’s this about?

The International Code for Zoological Nomenclature lays out the requirements for naming a new species of animal. Included in this this the requirement of a preserved specimen Ithe type) to be kept at a museum for reference. Garraffoni and Frietas argue that for specimens that don’t preserve well (that is, they break down and can’t be effectively studied after preservation), that a photograph or photographs should stand in instead of a preserved specimen. Gutierrez and Pine argue back that even if a specimen is reduced to goo, it should still be required if only for the possibility of DNA preservation.

Why does it matter?

We have to have rules about naming species, or else anyone can name them. Having a reference specimen is an important part of this.

Why did I read this?

I’ve been lecturing on the definition of species and the requirements to name new species. This seemed like a good let of letters to read.

Published by paleololigo

Scientist (Paleontology, Geochemistry, Geology); Writer (Speculative and Science Fiction, plus technical and non-technical Science); Mom to great boy on the Autism spectrum; possessor of too many hobbies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: